| 
Provided by Amazon.com, The World Trusted Store. |
|
|
| 
 enlarge
| Brand: Nikon
Category: Photography
Buy New: $2,394.99
New (21)
Rating:  25 reviews
Sales Rank: 861
Media: Electronics
Autographed: No
Memorabilia: No
Monitor Size: 300
Includes Software: Yes
Display Size: 3
Maximum Resolution: 12.1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 2.2
Dimensions (in): 5.8 x 3 x 4.8
nv:Sensor: 12.1 Megapixel
Storage Media: Compact Flash Type I
Compressed Format: TIFF
Compressed Format: RAW
Compressed Format: JPEG/EXIF v2.21
LCD Monitor: 3.0-inch
LCD Pixels: 920,000 pixels
LCD Coverage: 100%
Shutter Speed: 1/8,000 sec.
Continuous Shooting: Single
Continuous Shooting: Continuous FPS
Playback: Histogram
Playback: Auto Rotate
Playback: Slideshow
Playback: Thumbnails
Self-timer: Yes
Computer Interface: HDMI
Computer Interface: USB 2.0 high-speed
Video Out: NTSC/PAL
MPN: D700 Body
Model: D700 Body
UPC: 018208254446
EAN: 0001820825446
ASIN: B001BTCSI6
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: Expedited shipping available
Condition: Brand new in retail pack, shipping same day with ups.
| |
|
| Customer Reviews:
 a d3 sensor in a d300 body October 15, 2008
1 out of 9 found this review helpful
numerous reviews have been written already about this classic....if you can't afford a d3, get this one instead. if you can't afford d700 get the d300.
The one I'd been waiting for October 13, 2008
9 out of 9 found this review helpful
I've been a semi-pro digital user for five years. I started wtih a Fuji S2, moved up to the Nikon D2H (horrible reliability, expensive), D2Hs, D200, D300 and finally the D700.
With every camera prior to the D700 there were compromises and Nikon was always two years behind Canon. Finally, when the D3 came out, they were in the lead again, but the price was too much for my semi-pro use to justify. So I struggled along with a pair of D300s for another eight months. The D300 is an excellent camera, however, it has some serious flaws: It overexposes and is particularly hot on the red channel. It's higher ISO performance is mediocre and really kills detail. And it's DX.
I bought a D700 for $2950 and, predictably, the price fell $200 a few days after that. But I needed it for an assignment that would involve shooting in a dimly light garage.
The camera worked perfectly, although once again, I am seeing overexposure in some scenes. The auto WB is much improved over the D300. The dynamic range is much improved, as well. And the AF seems faster.
This camera has me going back to prime lenses. The DOF is much shallower and the bokeh much nicer with my 85mm and 50mm lenses on the D700. Eventually, I want to be all primes on the long end. My 300 f/4 gives wonderful results on this body. The 70-200 is a mixed bag. I'm just not happy with the look of the images. They are not as sharp as they are on the D300 (I kept one). Weird. I'm still testing.
I love everthing about the D700 except it's tendency to overexpose and the fact Canon's competitor has video and more MP. Video really should have been on this camera; after all, the D90 at 1/3 the price has it. Nikon dropped the ball by not including it on the D700. Two months after being introduced, the D700 is already a somewhat obsolete camera, thanks to Canon's offering of more mp and video.
All that said, as a Nikon user I'm glad to finally have 5D image quality in a full-frame Nikon, even though it comes at a premium. I feel the current combo of the D300/D700 will last me for several years, and will eventually result in a transition to almost all prime lenses, if Nikon ever gets its act together and offers some worthy wide angle primes to match with this body. Meantime I find the 35 f/2, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.4, 105 micro, 180 f/2.8 and 300 f/4 to be excellent matches for this body. The Beast 28-70 f/2.8 is also a good performer on this body, as is the 14-24 f/2.8. The 70-200 f/2.8 is questionable.
Be sure to get the grip for best balance and extended battery life. I find the D700 has better battery performance than the D300. Also if you do portraits, get a portrait Expo Disc and download the portrait custom setting for your camera. The results are very nice.
Best Nikon for the near professional October 6, 2008
4 out of 5 found this review helpful
This is a wonderful camera. With quick startup, solid focusing, excellent exposure control. The fast speed allows the "existing light" photography so enjoyed the fast film camera days. While the D700 has controls for everything conceivable it is easier to select these features than it is with lesser Nikons. If you feel your digital photos are important then consider the quality the D700 offers.
Awesome dynamic range and low light capability! September 22, 2008
4 out of 4 found this review helpful
I purchased the Nikon D700 about three weeks ago now and it is an awesome camera. My previous frame of reference is my four year old Canon 20D and the D700 beats the Canon on every front. The added dynamic range of the Nikon's full-frame sensor means most photos are well exposed - including the sky and shadows. Often only minor adjustments are required post camera (I use Lightroom 2). I've also found that the autofocus on the Nikon D700 is light years ahead of the Canon. Focusing is not a problem. Then there is the low light performance of the Nikon D700. Wow! Indoor photography without flash is now possible. I purchased my D700 in a kit with Nikon's 24-120 mm zoom lense with vibration reduction. The vibration reduction combined with the ability to shoot at higher ISO settings means photos of moving subjects can be shot at higher shutter speeds - resulting in less blur. Overall, I am very satisfied with the D700.
Awesome camera September 21, 2008
1 out of 4 found this review helpful
I'm upgrading from a D200. By comparison, the low light capability is outstanding and the image quality is even better. Highly recommended. I didn't sell my first born for the D700 but it would be arguably worth it. :)
|
|
|
| |
